Analysis of English Language Teaching Materials on Gender Representation

Baiq Annisa Shallaita, Nawawi Nawawi, Muhammad Amin

Abstract


This study was conducted to show how two ELT textbooks accommodate gender in their contents and if there is any types of gender bias in the textbooks. The method of this study was descriptive qualitative method which was used to describe a phenomenon and its characteristics. The data was collected by using content analysis that was supported by descriptive quantitative data. The content analysis was conducted to analyze written text and photographs in the two EFL textbooks published by The Ministry of Education And Culture of the Republic of Indonesia and Erlangga publisher. The analysis was based on five categories, namely, visibility, firstness, masculine/feminine generic construction, occupation, and activities related to gender. The findings of study showed that gender biases still exist in both textbooks. The types of bias found were stereotyping, linguistic bias, imbalance and selectivity, cosmetic bias, and fragmentation and isolation. The latest types was only found in Pathway To English 1. The result of this study was expected to help the materials designer, author, teacher, and students to have a better understanding about gender representation of the book currently used in Lombok, and to be more aware of gender bias issues in ELT textbook. 


Keywords


ELT Materials; Textbook; Gender Representation; Gender Bias

Full Text:

PDF

References


Amini, M., & Birjandi, P. (2012).Gender Bias in the Iranian High School EFL Textbooks. English Language Teaching, 5(2).

ASPPUK. (2012). Feminisme liberal. Retrived from http://asppuk.or.id/ on November 5, 2020.

Beebe, J. D. (1996). Sexist language and teaching English as a foreign language. Gender Issues in Language Education, 100-113

Brugeilles, C & Cromer, S. (2009). Analysing Gender representations in School Textbooks.Paris: UMR CEPED

Brusokaite, E. (2013). Gender Representation InEfl Textbooks. Lithuanian University of Educational Sciences

Eckert, P., & McConnell-Ginet, S. (2003). Language and gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Gak, D.M. (2011) TEXTBOOK – AN IMPORTANT ELEMENT IN THE TEACHING PROCESS. Fakultettehničkihnauka – Engleskijezik, Novi Sad

Headmaster.(n.d). In oxford Learners Dictionary. Retrieved from https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/headmaster on January 31, 2021

Herdsmen. (n.d). In Merriam-Webster’s Online Dictionary. Retrieved from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/herdsman on January 31, 2021

Jackson, S.L. (2008). Research Method: A Modular Approach. Wadsworth: Thomson Wadsworth.

Kim, H., Sefcik, J.S., and Bradway, C. (2016) Characteristics of Qualitative Descriptive Studies: A Systematic Review. HHS Public Access.

Loan, D.T.B, Ha, N.T.M, Thuy, K.T.B, Tri, N, Hoa, T.T.A.H, Kivekas, H, Nikulainen, E, Dung, L.T.M, Geogescu, D, and Bernard, J.(2010). Guidelines for textbook review and analysis from a gender perspective. "National textbook review and analysis from a gender perspective, including piloting teacher training programmes to incorporate Gender Equality issues in line with the Law on Gender Equality and the Law on Domestic Violence Prevention and Control" (UN/Government of Viet Nam Joint Programme activity 1.3.15)

Luo, A. (2019, July 18). What is Content Analysis and How Can You Use It in Your research?. Retrived from https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/content-analysis/ on November 4, 2020

Marzuki. (2007). Kajian Awal Tentang Teori-Teori Gender. Jurnal Civics Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan Vol.4, No.2.

Megawangi, R. (1999). Membiarkan Berbeda: Sudut Pandang Baru tentang Relasi Gender. Bandung: Mizan. Cet. I.

Nassaji, H. (2015). Qualitative and descriptive research: Data type versus data analysis. Language Teaching Research, 19(2) 129–132

Sadker, D and Zittleman, K.(2002). Teacher Education Textbook: The Unfinished Gender Revolution. Educational Leadership: Journal of the Department of Supervision and Curriculum Development, N.E.A 60(4):59-63

Scott, K. P. (1981). Whatever happened to Jane and Dick? Sexism in texts re-examined. Peabody Journal of Education, 58, 135-140Sheldon, L.E. (1988). Evaluating ELT Textbook and Material.ELT Journal Volume 42/4.Oxford University Press.

UNESCO.(2015). Priority Gender Equality.Retrieved from https://en.unesco.org/genderequality on July 10, 2020

Workmen. (n.d). In Merriam-Webster’s Online Dictionary. Retrieved from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/workmen on January 31, 2021

Yonata, F& Yan M. (2017).The Representation of Gender in English Textbooks in Indonesia.Journal of Language and Literature




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v8i2.2423

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding (IJMMU) ISSN 2364-5369
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.