Due to the Verdict of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 21 / PUU-XII / 2014 on the Extension of Pretrial Institutional Authority in Indonesia
Abstract
After the Verdict of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 21 / PUU-XII / 2014 related to the review of Law No. 8 of 1981 concerning Criminal Procedure Laws against the 1945 Constitution, additional authority granted by the Act to the pretrial hearing through this verdict among others; examine the legitimate or not determination of the suspect, examine the legitimate or not of the search warrant, and examine the legitimate or not of the seizure orders.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Harjono, Konstitusi Sebagai Rumah Bangsa Pemikiran Hukum Dr. Harjono, S.H., M.C.L. Wakil Ketua MK, (Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi, 2008).
Oemar Seni Adji, KUHAP Sekarang, Penerbit Erlangga, Jakarta, 1985.
Loebby Loqman, Pra-Peradilan Di Indonesia, Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta, 1987.
M. Yahya Harahap, Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta 2002.
M. Yahya Harahap, Pembahasan Permasalahan Dan Penerapan KUHAP (Pemeriksaan Sidang Pengadilan, Banding, Kasasi, dan Peninjauan Kembali) Jilid II, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2008.
Naskah Akademik Rancangan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung tentang Hukum Acara Praperadilan, penerbit Institute for Criminal Justice Reform, 2014.
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 21/PUU-XII/2014 tanggal 28 April 2015.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v6i4.986
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2019 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.