Monolingual Development in Bilingual Family: Exploring Parental Language Policy within Family Domain

Irwan Nursidi

Abstract


The existence of three possible languages within intermarriage family, for example Javanese and Sasaknese from their parents and Indonesian from their surrounding should have led children become bilingual in nature. However, the reversed condition is prevailing where the use of Indonesian is predominantly used. This research locates three different aspects of family language policy namely language ideology, language management and language practice. This research aims at finding out why parents of intermarriage family incline the use of one language within family domain. This research employed qualitative data in order to understand and interpret family language behaviour and uses multi staged purposive sampling. The sample was four of immigrant mothers and four of Sasak mothers. The result showed the tendency to use indonesian in a family domain is due to  habitus which leads to culture capital and symbolic capital.


Keywords


Monolingual Development; Bilingual Family; Family Language Policy; Family Domain Language

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bourdieu, Pierre (1992). Language & Symbolic Power. Edited and introduced by John B. Thompson. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Creswell, J. 2002. Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.

Curdt-Christiansen, X. L. 2009. Invisible and Visible Language Planning: Ideological Factors in the Family Language Policy of Chinese Immigrant Families in Quebec. Journal on Language Policy 8 (4): 351–375. doi:10.1007/s10993-009-9146-7.

Curdt-Christiansen, X. L. 2013. Family Language Policy: Sociopolitical Reality Versus Linguistic Continuity. Journal on Language Policy 12 (1): 1–6. doi:10.1007/s10993-012-9269-0.

Fogle, L. W., and K. A. King. 2013. Child Agency and Language Policy in Transnational Families. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 19: 1–25

Hauwaert, S B, 2004. Language Strategies for Bilingual Families: The One-Parent-One-Language Approach. UK. Multilingual Matters Ltd.

Mejía. A, 2002. Power, Prestige and Bilingual. UK. Multilingual Matters Ltd

Schwartz, M. 2010. Family Language Policy: Core Issues of an Emerging Field. Applied Linguistics Review, 1 (1): 171– 191.

Shohamy, E. 2006. Language Policy: Hidden Agendas and New Approaches. New York: Routledge.

Sneddon, J 2003. The Indonesian Language: Its History and Role in Modern Society. Sydney. Australia: University of New South Wales Press Ltd

Spolsky, B. 2004. Language Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v6i3.804

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding (IJMMU) ISSN 2364-5369
https://ijmmu.com
[email protected]
dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.