Implementing the STAD Cooperative Learning Model to Improve Motivation and Social Studies Learning Outcomes among Sixth-Grade Elementary Students
Abstract
This classroom action research aimed to improve sixth-grade students’ motivation and learning outcomes in social studies on the topic of “struggles to defend Indonesian independence” through the implementation of the Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) cooperative learning model. The study employed the Kemmis and McTaggart spiral model of classroom action research consisting of planning, acting and observing, and reflecting, conducted in two cycles. The participants were 28 sixth-grade students (14 boys and 14 girls) in a public elementary school in Yogyakarta, Indonesia, who were organized into heterogeneous STAD teams. Data were collected through a learning achievement test, observation sheets of students’ learning activities, and a learning motivation questionnaire. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively by calculating mean scores, mastery percentages, and normalized gain (N-gain), while qualitative data from observations and field notes were analyzed through data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing. The results revealed a substantial improvement in students’ learning outcomes, with the mean score increasing from 73.64 in Cycle I to 84.29 in Cycle II, and the percentage of students achieving the minimum mastery criterion rising from 32.14% to 92.86%. The N-gain value reached 0.40 (40.40%), which falls into the medium category. Students’ motivation also increased from 70.2% to 84.48%, and learning activity rose from 62.5% to 82.7%. The implementation of STAD successfully created a more active, collaborative, and enjoyable classroom climate, fostered individual responsibility and teamwork, and strengthened students’ intrinsic motivation. These findings indicate that STAD is an effective instructional model for enhancing cognitive outcomes, social skills, and learning motivation in social studies within the framework of the Merdeka Curriculum.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adawiyah, R., Zubaidah, S., Listyorini, D., & Astriani, M. (2021). The potential of Remap STAD in improving motivation and academic achievement. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2330). American Institute of Physics Inc. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0043280
Adawiyah, R., Zubaidah, S., Listyorini, D., & Astriani, M. (2021). The potential of Remap STAD in improving motivation and academic achievement. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2330). American Institute of Physics Inc. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0043280
Ali, S. K. B. S., & Siong, N. U. (2023). Effectiveness of a comprehensive module in improving serving skills and lob shots during badminton training. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 23(5), 1130–1141. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2023.05141
Anggraini, D. A., Mashfufah, A., Rahayuningsih, S., Kuswandi, K., & Ramli, M. (2025). The effectiveness of the STAD-type cooperative learning model on student learning outcomes: Systematic literature review with the PRISMA protocol. Eduvest: Journal of Universal Studies, 5(4), 4744–4761. https://doi.org/10.60127/edv.v5i4.50011
Arikunto, S. (2019). Prosedur penelitian: Suatu pendekatan praktik (Edisi Revisi). Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Bakhouyi, A., & El Fakdi, A. (2023). Collaborative technologies and reflective learning models for K–12 education. Computers & Education, 196, 104676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104676
Bakhouyi, A., & El Fakdi, A. (2023). Integrating reflective digital tools in cooperative classrooms. Education Sciences, 13(8), 815. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13080815
Bakhouyi, A., El Fakdi, A., & Essaaidi, M. (2023). Reflective learning strategies and technological collaboration in primary education. Education and Information Technologies, 28(2), 1985–2002. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11183-6
Bennett, L., & Al-Harthy, K. (2023). Reflective and collaborative deep learning approaches in elementary education. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 5, 100227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100227
Bennett, S., et al. (2024). Integrating feedback and reflection to promote deep learning in higher education. BMC Medical Education, 24(1), Article 662. https://bmcmededuc.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12909-025-06648-3
Buchanan, T., & Hodge, S. (2023). Deep learning through reflective practice in collaborative classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 127, 104103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104103
Chen, B. (2023). Influence of cooperative learning on learners’ motivation: the case of Shenzhen primary school. Education 3-13, 51(4), 647–671. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2021.1998179
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
Desai, R. (2024). Using STAD as an Assessment for Learning (AfL) in Mathematics. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 37(Special Issue 2), 993–997. https://doi.org/10.16920/JEET/2024/V37IS2/24150
Eka Adnyana, M. (2020). Implementasi model pembelajaran STAD untuk meningkatkan motivasi dan prestasi belajar. Indonesian Journal of Educational Development (IJED), 1(3), 496–505. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4286979
Eslit, E. R. (2023). The effects of cooperative learning on student achievement: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. ResearchGate Preprint. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/370401155_Effects_of_Cooperative_Learning_on_Student_Achievement_A_Meta-Analysis_of_Randomized_Controlled_Trials
Fikri, A. (2025). The effectiveness of the student teams' achievement divisions in social studies learning on activeness and learning outcomes. Journal of Education and Learning, 19(2), 954–962. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v19i2.21526
Ghafour, S., Al-Hermi, H., & Al-Mahrooqi, R. (2022). The impact of STAD cooperative learning on primary students’ academic achievement and classroom engagement. International Journal of Instruction, 15(4), 587–604. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15432a
Ghufron, S., Nafiah, Syahruddin, Kaswadi, & Mustofa. (2023). The effect of STAD-type cooperative learning based on a learning tool on students’ critical thinking skills in writing materials. International Journal of Instruction, 16(1), 59–76. https://www.e-iji.net/dosyalar/iji_2023_1_4.pdf
Gilang Eko Setyo Suharjono & Chumi Zahroul Fitriyah. (2024). Peningkatan hasil belajar pendidikan Pancasila melalui model kooperatif tipe STAD pada siswa kelas V sekolah dasar. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Profesi Guru, 7(2), 257–269. https://doi.org/10.23887/jippg.v7i2.78492
Irawan, F., Zubaidah, S., Sulisetijono, & Astriani, M. (2021). Does Remap-STAD have the potential to promote students’ creative thinking skills. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2330). American Institute of Physics Inc. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0043179
Jarolimek, J. (2001). Teaching social studies in elementary schools. Prentice Hall.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Minnesota: University of Minnesota.
Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi (2025). Kurikulum Satuan Pendidikan 2025: Delapan Dimensi Profil Lulusan.
Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi. (2024). Panduan Profil Lulusan dan Capaian Pembelajaran Kurikulum Merdeka. Jakarta: Pusat Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran, Balitbang dan Perbukuan Kemendikbudristek.
Kovač, V. B. (2025). The why, what, and how of deep learning. Education Inquiry, 16(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2023.2194502
Kusuma Arum, S., Sunardi, S., & Widyastono, H. (2021). The Needs Analysis of Student Team Achievement Division Learning Model Development to Improve Science Learning Achievement of Children With Special Needs in Inclusive School. In ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3516875.3516978
León, B., Fernández-Eizaguirre, E., Marcos-Mangas, C., & González-Paneque, E. (2023). Cooperative learning, emotions, and academic performance in physical education. Psychology in Spain. https://journals.copmadrid.org/psed/art/psed2023a2
Liu, Q., Zhang, T., & Huang, J. (2024). Collaborative reflection and conceptual retention in social studies learning. Journal of Educational Research, 117(3), 312–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2023.2295678
Luthfi, F. Y., & Murtiyasa, B. (2024). The effectiveness of STAD-type cooperative learning model on mathematical problem-solving ability of elementary school students. JTMT: Jurnal Tadris Matematika, 5(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.381859103
Maelasari, E., & Wahyudin. (2017). Effects of Cooperative Learning STAD on Mathematical Communication Ability of Elementary School Student. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 895). Institute of Physics Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/895/1/012090
Maqsood, Z., Sajjad, M., & Yasmin, R. (2025). Effect of feedback-integrated reflection on deep learning of undergraduate medical students in a clinical setting. BMC Medical Education, 25, Article 66. https://bmcmededuc.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12909-025-06648-3
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Ngatman, Salimi, M., Lintang, N. S., Hidayah, R., & Zainnuri, H. (2024). The implementation of student teams’ achievement divisions applying multimedia to improve learning outcomes for fifth grade students at elementary school. Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 12(2), 204-215. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpe.v12i2.68448
Novita, R. (2023). The effect of the Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) learning method on student learning outcomes in Indonesian language lessons at school. Munaddhomah, 4(2), 473–481. https://doi.org/10.31538/munaddhomah.v4i2.507
Nugroho, A., Mutiaraningrum, I., Wulandari, F. D., Agung, A. S. S. N., Muliyah, P., Sari, F. W., & Surtikanti, M. W. (2025). WhatsApp-integrated student team achievement division (STAD) in teaching English communicative competence: impact on students’ performance and perception. Computer Assisted Language Learning. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2025.2479142
Öztürk, B. (2023). The effect of cooperative learning models on learning outcomes: A second-order meta-analysis. Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 18(3), 49–65. https://doi.org/10.29329/epasr.2023.600.13
Prayitno, B. A., Sugiharto, B., & Titikusumawati, E. (2022). Effectiveness of collaborative constructivist strategies to minimize gaps in students’ understanding of biological concepts. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 17(11), 114–127. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i11.29891
Putra, R. A., & Nisa, S. (2024). Enhancing science education through the student teams achievement division (STAD) learning model. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 16(2), 1178–1192. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v16i2.5372
Rabiatul Adawiyah, S., Siti Zubaidah, D., Dwi Listyorini, & Meli Astriani. (2021). The potential of Remap STAD in improving motivation and academic achievement. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2330(1), 030032. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0043280
Ranmechai, S. (2023). Enhancing measurement education in schools: A study on the efficacy of STAD in undergraduate mathematics education. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 12(6), 330–337. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v12n6p330
Ridwan, A., Santosa, D., & Dewi, F. (2023). Implementasi model pembelajaran kolaboratif untuk memperkuat keterampilan sosial siswa SD. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Nusantara, 5(1), 12–20.
Samsuri, T., & Firdaus, L. (2017). Pengaruh pembelajaran kooperatif Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) terhadap keterampilan berpikir kritis siswa. Prisma Sains : Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu dan Pembelajaran Matematika dan IPA IKIP Mataram, 5(1), 15–19. https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v5i1.1110
Siller, H. S. (2024). Analyzing the impact of collaborative learning approach on grade-six students’ mathematics achievement and attitudes. Eurasian Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. https://www.ejmste.com/download/analyzing-the-impact-of-collaborative-learning-approach-on-grade-six-students-mathematics-14153.pdf
Slavin, R. E. (2014). Educational psychology: Theory and practice (10th ed.). Pearson Education Limited.
Slavin, R. E., & Madden, N. A. (2021). Student team learning and success for all: A personal history and overview. In Pioneering Perspectives in Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research, and Classroom Practice for Diverse Approaches to CL (pp. 128–145). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003106760-6
Slavin, R. E., & Madden, N. A. (2021). Student team learning and success for all: A personal history and overview. In P. J. Hartman & S. Sharan (Eds.), Pioneering perspectives in cooperative learning (pp. 128–145). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003106760-6
Sri Aprillia, B., Arinilhaq, Komariah, A., & Ramdhani, M. (2020). The use of student team achievement divisions in improving the learning outcome in physics course. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(5 Special Issue), 1065–1075.
Suharjono, G. E. S., & Fitriyah, C. Z. (2024). Peningkatan hasil belajar pendidikan Pancasila melalui model kooperatif tipe STAD pada siswa kelas V sekolah dasar. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Profesi Guru, 7(2), 257–269. https://doi.org/10.23887/jippg.v7i2.78492
Sukerti, N. N. (2020). Penerapan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar tematik pada siswa kelas III SD. Jurnal Edutech Undiksha, 8(1), 92–101. https://doi.org/10.23887/jeu.v8i1.27090
Syuhada, M. F. (2025). Application of the STAD-type cooperative learning model enhances student learning outcomes and engagement in natural science classes. GEHU Journal, 5(1), 112–123. https://journal-gehu.com/index.php/gehu/article/view/329
Tsingos, C., Bosnic-Anticevich, S., & Smith, L. (2015). Learning styles and approaches: Can reflective strategies encourage deep learning? Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 7(4), 492–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2015.03.004
Turnip, F., Simanjuntak, S. D., Lumbanraja, B., Sembiring, H., & Silaban, P. J. (2024). Pengaruh model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa pada pembelajaran matematika kelas IV SD. Pendas: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 9(4), 233–242. https:// www.journal.unpas.ac.id/index.php/pendas/article/download/19063/9270/79807
Vázquez-Toledo, S., Latorre-Cosculluela, C., & Liesa-Orús, M. (2020). Analyzing “student team-achievement divisions” effects in learning and academic results. Revista Electrónica Educare, 25(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.15359/ree.25-1.1
Widarti, H. R., & Amalia, E. R. F. (2024). The implementation of integrated Instagram learning media with STAD on increasing learning outcomes. E3S Web of Conferences, 481, 04002. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202448104002
Wulandari, R., Putra, A., & Rahmawati, D. (2022). The Student Teams Achievement Divisions (STAD) learning model in its influence on the motivation and science learning outcomes of elementary school students. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA, 11(3), 289–298. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/363614237
Yaşar, M. D., Erdoğan, M., Batdı, V., & Cinkara, Ü. (2024). Evaluation of cooperative learning in science education: A mixed-meta method study. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(3), 411–427. https://www.scimath.net/article/evaluation-of-cooperative-learning-in-science-education-a-mixed-meta-method-study-14872
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v13i3.7359
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.

















