Characteristics of Criminal Liability of Political Parties in Corruption Offenses
Abstract
Political parties play a strategic role in advancing democracy, but they are increasingly faced with issues that cast a negative light on their organizations. These issues include, first, the involvement of political parties in various corruption cases, which damages their public image and reduces public trust in them; second, the legal debate surrounding the criminal liability of political parties implicated in corruption cases; and third, the challenge of imposing criminal sanctions on political parties or corporations as legal entities proven to have committed corruption offenses. Political parties are associations composed of individuals, an element defining them as organizations or management bodies within the parties. Political parties manage independent finances and are considered part of “organized wealth” and a “legal entity” capable of acting on their own behalf. This establishes that, fundamentally, political parties possess characteristics akin to corporations in the context of corruption offenses.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abidin, A. Z. (1983). Bunga Rampai Hukum Pidana, Pradnya Paramita. Pradnya Paramita.
Anonim.. (2018). Seputar Anggaran Dasar Pt Yang Wajib Di Pahami;Dalam Http;//Easybiz.Id/Seputar-Perubahan-Anggara-Dasar-Pt-Yang-Wajib-Anda Pahami/Diakses Pada Hari Jumat 10 Maret 2023 Jam 20.20 Wib’.
Barda nawawi Arief. (2003). Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Barda Nawawi Arief. (2006). Materi Penataran Hukum Pidana dan kriminologi kerjasama ASPEHUPIKI dan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Diponegoro. ASPEHUPIKI dan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Diponegoro.
Dwidja, M. &Priyatno. (1991). Pertanggungjawaban Korporasi Dalam Hukum Pidana. STHB.
Fukuyama, F. (2005). Memperkuat Negara, Tata Pemerintahan dan Tata dunia Abad 21. Gramedia Pustaka.
H Man S. Sastrawidjaja. (2005). Bunga Rampai Hukum Dagang,. alumni.
HS, S. (2008). Pengantar Hukum Perdata Tertulis (BW). Sinar grafika.
Inge Amundsen. (1997). Political Corruption: An Introduction to the Issues. Chr Michelsen Institute, Development Studies and Human rights.
Kristian and Yopi Gunawan. (2017). Sistem Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Di Tinjau Dari Berbagai Konvensi Internasional,. Refika Aditama.
Menurut pembentukkannya, yakni badan hukum publik dan badan hukum privat. (n.d.).
N.E. Algra et all. (1983). Kamus Istlah Hukum Fockema Andreae Belanda-Indonesia,. Binacipta.
Otto van Gierke, and A. R. (1993). Badan Hukum Dan Kedudukan Badan Hukum Perserioan,Perkumpulan,Koperasi,Yayasan. alumni.
Peter Mmahmud M. (2016). Penelitian Hukum. Kencana Prenada Media Group.
R.Wiyono. (2009). Pembahasan Undang-Undang Pemberantasan Tidak Pidana Korupsi,. Sinar Grafik.
Sajipto Rahardjo. (1991). Ilmu Hukum. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Sajipto Rahardjo. (2007). Mendudukan Undang-Undang Dasar Suatu Pembahasan dari Optik Ilmu Hukum Umum. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Saldi Isra. (2017). Pemilu dan Pemulihan Daulat Rakyat,. Themis Publishing.
Sutan Remi Sjahdeini. (2017). Ajaran Pemidanaan Tindak Pidana korporasi & Seluk Beluknya,. Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Sutan Remy Sjahdeini. (2017). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi, PT.Grafiti Pers, Jakarta, 2007,:43, bandingkan dengan Dwidja Priyatno & Kristian, Kebijakan Formulasi Sistem Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Dalam Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Khusus Di Luar KUHP Di Indonesia,. Sinar grafika.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v12i1.6333
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.