Position of Dispute Board in Construction Dispute Resolution in Indonesia

Muhammad Imam Dani Putra, Hengki Andora

Abstract


This article discusses criticism regarding the use of construction dispute boards in Indonesia as a choice of forms of construction dispute resolution, both from the institutional aspect and aspects of authority, process, and follow-up of the agreement as regulated in the Regulation of the Minister Public Works and Housing Number 11 of 2021 concerning governance, methods, and technical instructions of the Construction Dispute Board. The use of settlement through the construction dispute board is a new perspective in the world of construction. This new view will be the answer to the problem, or it can be a waste for the construction parties. This study aims to identify the characteristics and things that need to be anticipated in the use of construction dispute boards so that service users or employers with contractors can get the best possible benefits in construction service work. The method of this research is to examine the construction dispute board regulations in Indonesia and abroad.

Keywords


Construction Dispute Board, Construction Services, Contract, Loan, FIDIC

Full Text:

PDF

References


Fédération Internationale Des Ingénieurs-Conseils. (2006). Conditions of Contract for Construction, MDB Harmonised Edition, FIDIC. Geneve, Switzerland.

Fitriyanti, F., & Adly, E. (2022). Lessons Learned in the Use of Dispute Boards to the Settlement of Construction Service Disputes. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction.

Hardjomuljadi, S. (2017). Dispute Board as the Alternative Dispute Resolution for Construction in Indonesia Based on the Law No 2 Year 2017. Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering), 1-20.

Hardjomuljadi, S. (2020). Use of Dispute Avoidance and Adjudication Boards. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction.

Ismanto, H., & Hardjomuljadi, S. (2018). ANALISIS PENGARUH DEWAN SENGKETA & ARBITRASE TERHADAP PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KONSTRUKSI BERDASARKAN FIDIC CONDITION OF CONTRACT 2017. Jurnal Konstruksia, 10.

Jannah, M., & Musjtar, D. (2019). Penyelesaian Sengketa Wanprestasi Akibat Keterlambatan Pelaksanaan Perjanjian Konstruksi Bangunan. UIR Law Review Vol. 3 No. 2, 47.

Lature, K. (2018). Analisis Penyelesaian Sengketa Konstruksi Di Indonesia. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia Vol 15, No 3, 219.

Nugroho, S. (2015). Penyelesaian Sengketa Arbitrase dan Penerapan Hukumnya. Jakarta: Kencana.

Owen, G. (2015). The working of the dispute adjudication board (DAB) under new FIDIC 1999 (new red book). Retrieved April 9, 2023, from http://fidic.org/sites/default/files/11%20DAB.pdf

Soekanto, S. (1986). Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia Press.

Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2004). Penelitian Hukum Normatif, 8th ed. Jakarta: Grafindo Persada.

Legislation

Law No. 30 of 1999 concerning Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution

Presidential Regulation Number 12 of 2021 concerning Amendments to Presidential Regulation Number 16 of 2018 concerning Government Procurement of Goods and Services

Regulation of the Government Goods and Services Procurement Policy, Agency Number 1 of 2022, concerning Guidelines for Implementation of International Procurement of Goods and Services

Regulation of the MPWH Number 11 of 2021 concerning procedures and technical instructions for the Construction Dispute Board




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v10i6.4796

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding (IJMMU) ISSN 2364-5369
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.