Steel Joint Consortium (Iran, Afghanistan, Russia, China, India and Germany) in Herat, and the Economic, Political and Security Impacts in the Region, by Futuristic Approach with an Emphasis on SWOT

Amir Tavakoli Roody, Amir Sadra Javanshiri

Abstract


Geopolitical weight has a direct relationship with the geopolitical prestige of the country in the global and regional system, which can increase the dignity and public reputation of the country among other larger, equal or smaller countries. The more credibility and dignity increases, the more provide new opportunities for visible or invisible power, to objectively and subjectively influence processes, decisions, actions and behaviors at different local, regional and global scales. The geopolitical position of eastern Iran, due to its proximity to the countries of central Asia and Afghanistan and its access to high-energy resources; its domination on the world's most important energy and commodity transfer pathways; the strategic location for the land locked countries in Central Asia, Caucasus and Afghanistan to access free waters, connecting China and the countries of Southeast Asia to Europe; and the formation of the KhafHerat-China triangle and the region as a gateway for east of the country. The formation of this consortium between relevant countries, particularly five powerful countries in the steel industry in Herat can be considered as a factor in the emergence of Iran's geopolitical power and expanding Iran's influence in the region and Central Asia. Generally, the presence of regional and trans-regional economic powers and the convergence of these countries in the formation of a joint consortium can create a massive geopolitical weight to prevent US threats .Although, this project shows a clear horizon, but there are definitely problems with this process to assess the strengths, weaknesses, threats and opportunities of the swot model, to better recognize the partnership environment. The research method in this paper is descriptiveanalytical and data collection is based on documentary-library method. In this research quantitative and qualitative resources are simultaneously used relative to the problem under discussion which is called mixed research method.


Keywords


Consortium; Futuristic approach; Swot; Resilient economy; National economy; Regional; Global Economy;

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ibrahim Bai Salami, GholamHaidar. (2013). Restoration of the Silk Road with the Iran-China Railway, Eastern Daily.

TavakoliRoody, Amir. (2011). Economic, Political, and Security Impact of Mineral Activities in Sangan Minerals, Islamic Azad University, Taibad.

TavakoliRoody. (2015). Manifest: An Introduction to the Strategic Document, Horizon and Perspective of 1404 Khaf Area with a Futuristic Approach.

TavakoliRoodi. (2017). A Presentation of Strategic Partnership Model of Strategic Role of Human Resource Management in Sangan Iron Ore Mining in Developing Relations and Convergence in Central Asia.

Hafez Nia, Mohammad Reza. (2002). Political Geography of Iran, Tehran.

Hafez Nia, Mohammad Reza. (2000). The Basics of Socio-Political Studies (1) Qom Organization of seminary Schools.

Hafez Nia, Mohammad Reza and Rumina Ibrahim. (2005). Analysis of geopolitical capacities of southeastern shores of Iran in line with national resources of the 2nd congress of Iranian Geopolitics Association, Tehran.

Hafez Nia, Mohammad Reza. (2006). The Principles of Geopolitics, Mashhad, Papeli Publication.

Hafez Nia, Mohammad Reza, Kaviani Rad Murad, (2013). New Horizons in Political Geography, Tehran, Samt Publishing.

Hassan KhaniSaeed. (2015). The Effect of Convergence on the Empowering Members of the Echo, Tehran, Ellshen Publishers and dependent on MehrCultural Informatics Institute.

Khalili, Mohsen, MortezaManshadi, FahimehAzemedeh. (2011). Geo-economic dependencies of development of East Iran, Foreign Relations Quarterly, Third Year, No. 4.

Rads, Kelaz. (2011). Geopolitics, A Very Short Review, Translated by pishgahifard Zahra and ZohdiGoharpour, Mohammad Tehran Sepehr Publishing.

Rahimpour, Ali. (2005). Geostrategic Developments in the 21st Century and Regional position of Iran, 2005/12/8.

Dehshiri, Mohammad Reza. (2009). The Conceptual and Conceptual Reflection of the Islamic Revolution in Iran in International Relations, Tehran, Iran.

Zare, Ibrahim. (2010). A list of principles in the Chabahar area, Ibrahim Zare, Transportation magazine No. 94.

Ezati, Ezatollah. (2005). Energy Geoeconomics and its Security Consequences, Bureau of Political and International Studies.

Lottwack Edwardian, From Geopolitics to Geo-Economics, The Dispute Logic of Business Instructions,

The Paper Published in the Book, "Geopolitical Thoughts of the Twentieth Century'',Weltby Simon and Ruthel, Powell, translated by Hafez Nia Mohammad Reza and NasiriHashem, Tehran State Department 2001.

MojtahedZadeh, Victory, Political Geography and Geography, Tehran, 1382.

Mowlana, Tahmina, The Dilemma of land locked Countries, EmirabKabir Entrepreneurs Magazine No. 1391, 79.

Mir Heydar, Dareh. (2004). Basis of Political Geography, Tehran: samt Publication.

Nami, Hassan and Abbasi, Alireza . (2009). Analysis of geo-economics position of Iran in the Middle East. Geopolitical Quarterly, Fifth, No. 2.

Vaezi, Mahmoud (2010), Iran and the threats posed by instability in Afghanistan and Pakistan, crisis centers in Asia, Strategic Studies Institute

Barzegar, Kayhan. (2006). Contradiction of Roles: A Study of the Origins of the Irene-American Conflict after the September 11th Accidents, Strategic Quarterly, No. 39.

Sadjadpour, Seyyed Mohammad Kazem. (2008). Western Asia, America and the International System: Geopolitics and Hegemony, West Asia, International System and Regional Integration, Tehran: Cultural and Social Studies.

Safavi, SeyyedYahya Rahim. (2010). US Objectives in the Military Invasion to Afghanistan, Human Geography Quarterly, No. 3.

Fayyaz, Mohammad Ashaq. (2008). Pashtunistan Political Challenges in Afghanistan and Pakistan, Qom, Masoumiin Publications.

Esmat Allahi, Mohammad Hashem, the United States and the Taliban Yesterday and Today, Iran's Daily News 3/07/1389.

Karami Jahangir. (2010). Iran-Russia Relationshipsbetween 1989 and 2009; Grounds, Factors and Limitations, Central Eurasian Studies Quarterly, Third Year, No. 6, pp. 136-111.

Jahanbakhsh, Mohammad Taghi. (1393). Security Policy of the Russian Federation towards Afghanistan (2014-2001), Master's Thesis, Eurasian Studies, Tehran, Department of International Affairs, Department of Foreign Affairs.

Economic Outlook for the Middle East and North Africa Region Quarterly, No. 5, July 2015.

Rahmani Ali. (2005). Germany: National and Security Interests of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Tehran: Cultural Museum of International Studies and Research of Tehran's Contemporary Abrar.

Shinn, J & Dobbins, J. (2011). " Afghan Peace Talks ", A Primer Santa Monica: RAND Corporation.

Xichao Yu. (2014). “China’s Rise in Central Asia Implications for EUInterests”, European Institute for Asian Studies.

stepanov, Ekaterin. (2009). " Iran and Afghanistan": cross Border security

Challenges, conflict Management, and Iran u-s. Relations, "PONARS Eurasia policy memo, NO.5.

Maley, William. (1998). Fundamentalism Reborn: Afghanistan and the Taliban, Newyork: Newyork university press.

Microsoft. ensartareferencdlibrary, 2005.

Dwivedm. R. L. (1990). Foundmentalsof political geography: chaitanyapubishing house.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v5i2.236

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding (IJMMU) ISSN 2364-5369
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.