Navigating E-Learning: EFL Teachers’ Insights and Attitudes toward ELT and CLT Principles: A Comparative Study

Nasrin Shokrpour, Shadab Moslehi, Laleh Khojasteh, Sedigheh Shakib Kotamjani

Abstract


Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) has emerged as a prominent method in language education, emphasizing interaction and real-life communication to enhance language proficiency. With the rapid advancement of digital technologies, the application of CLT principles in e-learning environments has gained significant attention. This study explores the familiarity and perceptions of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) teachers regarding CLT principles, comparing their implementation in non-profit private schools and private language centers. Employing a mixed-methods approach, we gathered data through adapted questionnaires and recorded online teaching sessions and analyzed them using the Communicative Orientation of Language Teaching (COLT) Observation Scheme. The findings revealed that teachers in private language centers displayed more positive perceptions of CLT and more effectively integrated digital tools and interactive strategies into their online instruction, compared to their counterparts in non-profit private schools. However, it was found that there was no significant disparity in overall attitudes toward CLT between the two groups, suggesting that institutional conditions and individual teaching experiences may mediate these perceptions. The study underscores the need for targeted professional development, curricular reforms, and enhanced resource provision to enhance the implementation of CLT in EFL e-learning environments and to promote more communicative, learner-centered instruction.


Keywords


Communicative Language Teaching (CLT); E-learning Environments; Iranian EFL Teachers; Private Language Centers; Non-profit Private Schools

Full Text:

PDF

References


Liu H, Jin J. Research Trends in Communicative Language Teaching: A Bibliometric Analysis from 2014 to 2023. English Language Teaching and Linguistics Studies. 2024;6(5): 256. DOI:10.22158/eltls.v6n5p256

Fortes TL. The Communicative Approach in the Acquisition of English as a Second Language: A Case Study. cippus-revista de iniciação científica, 2021;9(1):1-18.

Tain W. A Comprehensive Literature Review on Communicative Language Teaching (CLT). Frontiers in Sustainable Development.2025;5(3):197-205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54691/90101304

Ziegler N, González-Lloret M. The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition and Technology. Routledge Abingdon. 2022.

Alamri WA. Communicative language teaching: Possible alternative approaches to CLT and teaching contexts. English Language Teaching. 2018;11(10):132-138.

A'yuni ZQ. A study on the implementation of communicative language teaching (CLT) in EFL online classroom Jakarta: FITK UIN Syarif Hidayatullah, Jakarta. 2021

Nisha PR. Communicative language teaching (CLT) in improving speaking skills of tertiary level EFL students of Bangladesh. FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching. 2024;5(2):120-130.

Dellagiacoma D, Busetta P, Gabbasov A, Perini A, Susi A. Authoring interactive videos for e-learning: The ELEVATE Tool Suite. Methodologies and Intelligent Systems for Technology Enhanced Learning, 10th International Conference. 2020

Al-Maroof RS, Alahbabi NMN, Akour I, Alhumaid K, Ayoubi K, Alnnaimi M, Thabit S, Alfaisal R, Aburayya A, Salloum S. Students’ perception towards behavioral intention of audio and video teaching styles: An acceptance study. International Journal of Data and Network Science. 2022;6(2): 603.

Foley J. CLT using CEFR and EIL in Southeast Asia and East Asia in the English language classroom. RELC Journal, 2022;53(1):240-252.

Waibel C. Nonverbal communication & rapport in online intercultural conversations: The impact of nonverbal communication on the creation of rapport in computer-mediated intercultural encounters. An MA thesis, University of Utrecht. 2022.

Harsch C, Mueller-Karabil A, Buchminskaia E. Addressing the challenges of interaction in online language courses. System. 2021;103, 102673.

Kibuku RN, Ochieng DO, Wausi AN. e‑Learning challenges faced by universities in Kenya: A literature review. Electronic Journal of E-learning, 202018(2),150‑161.

Panpistharwee P, Suwanarak K. Implementing the CLT approach in online instruction during the COVID-19 pandemic: Opportunities and challenges encountered by Thai EFL university lecturers. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network. 202417(2), 655-678.

Taridi M, Risnita Yaakob MFM, Khairani M. An evaluative study for communicative language teaching (CLT) on online teaching and learning in higher education: Indonesian and Malaysian University Context. Education and Information Technologies. 2023;29(1):1-37. DOI:10.1007/s10639-023-12221-6

Hemmati MR, Aziz Malayeri F. Iranian EFL teachers’ perceptions of obstacles to implementing student-centered Learning: A mixed-methods study. International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 2022;10(40):133-152.

Kheirabadi R, Alavimoghaddam SB. Evaluation of prospect series: A paradigm shift from GTM to CLT in Iran. Journal of Language Teaching and Research. 2016;7(3):619-624.

Fereidoni J, Baniadam I, Tadayyon N. Students' attitudes toward Grammar Translation Method (GTM) and Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) in English for specific purposes (ESP) courses in Urmia University of Medical Sciences (UMSU). Studies in Medical Sciences. 2018;29(4):305-316.

Ashraf B, Singh A, Uwimpuhwe G, Higgins S, Kasim A. Individual participant data meta-analysis of the impact of educational interventions on pupils eligible for free school meals. British Educational Research Journal. 2021;47(6):1675-1699. DOI: 10.1002/berj.374

Gloriez, P. Communicative language teaching and its implementation in online learning: The teachers’ voice. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics. 2022;7(1):157-170.

Dos Santos LM. The discussion of communicative language teaching approach in language classrooms. Journal of Education and e-Learning Research. 2020;7(2):104-109.

Al-Habsi T, Al-Busaidi S, Al-Issa A. Integrating technology in English language teaching through a community of practice in the Sultanate of Oman: Implications for policy implementation. Educational Research for Policy and Practice. 2022;21(1):43-68.

Shannon-Baker P. Making paradigms meaningful in mixed-methods research. Journal of mixed methods research, 201610(4), 319-334.

Dornyei Z. Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford University Press. (2007

Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL. Revisiting mixed methods research designs twenty years later. In Poth C. (Ed.), Sage handbook of mixed methods designs (pp. 623–635). Sage.2023

Karavas-Doukas E. Using attitude scales to investigate teachers' attitudes to the communicative approach. ELT Journal. 1996;50(3):187–198, doi.org/10.1093/elt/50.3.187

Lawshe CH. A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology 1975;28(4):563-575.

Rubio DM, Berg-Weger M, Tebb SS, Lee ES, Rauch S. Objectifying content validity: Conducting a content validity study in social work research. Social Work Research. 2003;27(2):94-104.

Flanagan J, Beck CT. Polit & Beck's nursing research generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice.12th Edition. Wolters Kluwer Health. 2025.

Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. psychometrika. 1951;16(3):297-334.

Spearman C. Correlation calculated from faulty data. British Journal of Psychology. 1910;3(3):271.

Spada N, Fröhlich M. COLT communicative orientation of language teaching observation scheme: Coding conventions and applications. National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research, Sydney.1995.

Rahimi M, Naderi F. The relationship between EFL teachers’ attitudes towards CLT and perceived difficulties of implementing CLT in language classes. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature. 2014;3(3):237-245.

Qasserras L. Systematic review of communicative language teaching (CLT) in language education: A balanced perspective. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy. 2023;4(6):17-23.

Chen H, Bhattacharyya E, Wu C, Gao X. Chinese teachers’ perceptions on implementation of CLT in college business English class. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal. 2023;8(26):77-83.

Alghamdi A. The impact of EFL teachers' pedagogical beliefs and practices: Communicative language teaching in a Saudi University Context. English Language Teaching. 2021;14(12):171-182.

Kabir MH, Jamila F, Sultana N. Impediments to the implementation of CLT principles at the SSC level in Bangladesh: A case study. Creative Education. 2020;11(07):1090.

Alharbi AOR. Recontextualising communicative language teaching in Saudi Arabia University of Glasgow. A PhD thesis, University of Glasgow. 2022.

Mo X . ELT and EFL teachers in Chinese universities. In Teaching Reading and Teacher Beliefs: A Sociocultural Perspective (p23-47), 2020. DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-47170-5_2

Ghorbani MR, Neissari M. Washback effect of the Iranian concours on senior high school students' EFL learning activities. International Journal of Language Testing. 2015;5(1):1-28.

Nguyen VTT. Attitudes and difficulties that Vietnamese teachers have towards communicative language teaching in different teaching contexts: Public schools and private English centers LCC tarptautinis universitetas. An MA thesis, LCC Intern University. 2022.

Gapparova AN. The effective methods and principles of communicative language teaching. Academic Research in Educational Sciences. 2021;2(Special Issue 1):15-20.

Gholami J, Sarkhosh M, Abdi H. An exploration of teaching practices of private, public, and public-private EFL teachers in Iran. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability. 2016;18(1):16-33.

Fairman JC, Smith DJ, Pullen PC, Lebel S.J. The challenge of keeping teacher professional development relevant. In Leadership for Professional Learning (pp. 251-263). Routledge. 2022.

Sun Q, Zhang LJ. A sociocultural perspective on English-as-a-foreign-language (EFL) teachers’ cognitions about form-focused instruction. Frontiers in Psychology. 2021;12:593172.

Dorendorf M. Finding a balanced blend: Designing and supporting engaging and effective integrated skills materials for adult ESL blended learning classrooms. 2021.

Tayyebi M, Abbasabady MM, Abbassian GR. Examining classroom writing assessment literacy: A focus on in-service EFL teachers in Iran. Language Testing in Asia. 2022;12(1):12.

Mohammadi M, Moradi K. Exploring change in EFL teachers’ perceptions of professional development. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability. 2017;19(1):22-42.

Castro R. Blended learning in higher education: Trends and capabilities. Education and Information Technologies. 2019;24(4): 2523-2546.

Goodrich NH. English in Iran. World Englishes. 2020;39(3):482-499.

Meylina M, Ardiasih LS, Rahmiaty R. Teachers’ digital competences: An overview on technological perspectives. Linguists: Journal Of Linguistics and Language Teaching. 2021;7(2):29-43.

Reeve J, Cheon SH. Autonomy-supportive teaching: Its malleability, benefits, and potential to improve educational practice. Educational Psychologist. 2021;56(1):54-77.

Fructuoso IN, Robalino PE, Ahmedi S. The flexibility of the flipped classroom for the design of mediated and self-regulated learning scenarios. RIED-Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia. 2023;26(2):1-21.

Tsai YR. Promotion of learner autonomy within the framework of a flipped EFL instructional model: Perception and perspectives. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2021;34(7):979-1011.

Fauzi NI, Ridwan R. The impact of communicative language teaching on English speaking skills. Dinasti International Journal of Education Management and Social Science. 2025;6(3):1774–1781. https://doi.org/10.38035/dijemss.v6i3.3819

Teng MF, Wen EZ, Li D. Communicative and task-based language teaching: Where are we now? The Language Learning Journal. 2025;53(6):685-693. DOI:10.1080/09571736.2025.2572673




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v13i8.7670

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding (IJMMU) ISSN 2364-5369
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2026 IJMMU. This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).