The Validity of the Execution of Fiduciary Security Objects After Constitutional Court Decision Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019 (A Case Study at PT Adira Finance Gorontalo Branch)

Yesa Masayu, Rhama Wisnu Wardhana

Abstract


Fiduciary security is one of the legal instruments widely used in financing activities in Indonesia, particularly in consumer financing transactions. The enactment of Constitutional Court Decision Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019 has significantly changed the mechanism for executing fiduciary security objects by requiring the existence of an agreement regarding default and voluntary surrender of the collateral object by the debtor. This study aims to analyze the validity of the execution of fiduciary security objects conducted by PT Adira Finance Gorontalo Branch after the Constitutional Court Decision, examine whether the debtor's actions fulfill the criteria of default as stipulated in Article 15 of Law Number 42 of 1999 concerning Fiduciary Security, and identify dispute resolution mechanisms available to debtors. This research employs normative legal research using statutory and conceptual approaches. The findings indicate that the execution of fiduciary security objects by PT Adira Finance Gorontalo Branch demonstrates partial conformity with Constitutional Court Decision Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019, as efforts have been made to prioritize persuasive measures and legal procedures, although practices of direct repossession are still found. Furthermore, the determination of debtor default cannot be made unilaterally by creditors and must be based on mutual agreement or judicial mechanisms. Disputes arising from fiduciary security execution may be resolved through both non-litigation and litigation processes, with non-litigation being more frequently used in practice due to its efficiency, while litigation provides stronger legal certainty. Therefore, the implementation of fiduciary security execution must be carried out in accordance with the principles established by the Constitutional Court in order to ensure legal certainty, justice, and protection for both creditors and debtors.


Keywords


Fiduciary Security; Execution; Constitutional Court Decision; Default; Dispute Resolution

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdullah, J. (2016). Jaminan Fidusia di Indonesia (Tata Cara Pendaftaran dan Eksekusi). Jurnal Lingkungan, 4(2), 117.

Bahsan, M. (2012). Hukum Jaminan dan Jaminan Kredit Perbankan Indonesia. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Bouzen Robert, A. (2021). Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia terhadap Debitur yang Wanprestasi setelah Keluarnya Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019. Jurnal Gagasan Hukum, 3(2).

Djalali, L. O. M. I., Niasa, L., & Fatmawati, S. (2020). Tinjauan Delik Penarikan Paksa terhadap Barang Jaminan Fidusia (Studi Kasus di PT Adira Dinamika Multifinance Cabang Kota Kendari). Sultra Law Review, 2(2), 1156–1170.

Harahap, Y. (2023). Ruang Lingkup Permasalahan Eksekusi Bidang Perdata (3rd ed.). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Heriawanto, B. K. (2019). Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Obyek Jaminan Fidusia Berdasarkan Title Eksekutorial. Legality: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 27(1), 54–67.

Johnny. (2006). Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif (Revised ed.). Malang: Banyumedia Publishing.

Keraf, V. V. M. (2021). Analisis Yuridis Eksekusi Objek Jaminan Fidusia setelah Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019. Fiat Iustitia: Jurnal Hukum, 2(1).

Kosasih, J. I., Agung, A. A. I., & Dewi, A. A. S. L. (2022). Parate Eksekusi Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019 dan No. 02/PUU-XIX/2021 terhadap Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia atas Lembaga Pembiayaan Leasing. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan, 10(1), 116–135.

Major, W. T. (2018). Hukum Kontrak. Bandung: Nuansa Cendekia.

Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Penelitian Hukum (Revised ed.). Jakarta: Kencana.

Meiliana, B. C., & Suryono, A. (2023). Implikasi dan Mekanisme Eksekusi Objek Jaminan Fidusia Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019 dalam Hal Debitur Wanprestasi. Jurnal Privat Law, 11(2), 305–313.

Meliza. (2023). Pengaruh Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019 terhadap Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia (Studi pada PT Adira Dinamika Multifinance Tbk Cabang Bengkulu). Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan (JISIP), 7(2).

Mulyati, E. (2016). Asas Keseimbangan pada Perjanjian Kredit Perbankan dengan Nasabah Pelaku Usaha Kecil. Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, 1(1).

Novita Alya Maeda, Mukhidin, & Hamzani, A. I. (2023). Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Penyelesaian Kredit Macet Jaminan Hak Tanggungan. Pancasakti Law Journal, 1(1).

Nurjanah, S. (2020). Implikasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019 terhadap Praktik Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia di Indonesia. Jurnal Rechtsvinding, 9(3), 457–459.

Prasetyo, E. S. (2020). Implikasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019 terhadap Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Lembaga Jaminan. Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 5(1), 43–62.

Purgito. (2022). Reaktualisasi Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019 secara Berkeadilan. Jurnal Surya Kencana Satu: Dinamika Masalah Hukum dan Keadilan, 13(2).

Salim HS. (2004). Perkembangan Hukum Jaminan di Indonesia. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Satrio, J. (2002). Hukum Perikatan: Perikatan yang Lahir dari Perjanjian. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Sayuti. (2020). Parate Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia: Urgensi dan Rekonstruksi Hukum Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019. Soumatera Law Review, 3(2).

Supriyono. (2016). Terciptanya Rasa Keadilan, Kepastian dan Kemanfaatan dalam Kehidupan Masyarakat. Jurnal Ilmiah Fenomena, 14(2), 1567–1582.

Susanti, D. O., & Efendi, A. (2018). Penelitian Hukum (3rd ed.). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Syafrida, & Hartati, R. (2020). Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia setelah Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019. ADIL: Jurnal Hukum, 11(1).

Syahrani, R. (2013). Seluk Beluk dan Asas-Asas Hukum Perdata. Bandung: Alumni.

Usman, R. (2020). Rekonstruksi Kekuatan Eksekutorial Jaminan Fidusia Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 27(2), 300–301.

Legislation

• Civil Code (Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata).

• Law Number 42 of 1999 concerning Fiduciary Security.

• Law Number 10 of 1998 concerning Amendment to Law Number 7 of 1992 on Banking.

• Presidential Regulation Number 9 of 2009 concerning Financing Institutions.

• Minister of Finance Regulation Number 84/PMK.012/2006 concerning Financing Companies.

• Financial Services Authority Regulation Number 35/POJK.05/2018 concerning Financing Company Operations.

• Regulation of the Chief of the Indonesian National Police Number 8 of 2011 concerning Security for the Execution of Fiduciary Security.

• Constitutional Court Decision Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v13i9.7596

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding (IJMMU) ISSN 2364-5369
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2026 IJMMU. This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).