Use of the Principle of Language Courage in Middle School Students
Abstract
The effectiveness of teachers in speaking using polite language in learning Indonesian to junior high school students by referring to the theory of politeness principles according to Leech (1983), Lakoff (1972), Brown and Lavinson (1978), Fraser (1978). This study uses descriptive qualitative methods to obtain naturalistic data, data collection using competent and free listening techniques and record techniques. The data analysis technique uses the interactive model of Miles and Huberman (2014) which has three components of analysis: data reduction, data presentation, and drawing conclusions or verification. The results of the study found 4 forms of politeness, namely: 1) maxim of wisdom, 2) maxim of generosity, 3) maxim of agreement, 4) maxim of modesty, while forms of violation of politeness principle are 2, namely: 1) maxim of generosity.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Agustina, S., & Cahyono, B. Y. (2016). Politeness and Power Relation in EFL Classroom Interactions : A Study on Indonesian Learners and Lecturers. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 3(2), 92–100.
Alika, S. D. (2017). PENYIMPANGAN PRINSIP KESANTUNAN BERBAHASA DALAM INTERAKSI BELAJAR MENGAJAR BAHASA INDONESIA (The Violation of Language Politeness Principles In The Interaction Of Indonesian Language Teaching And Learning). JALABAHASA, 13(1), 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.
Alwi, H. (2000). Indonesian: Users and Usages. Jakarta: Language Center.
Brown, P. & L. S. C. (1978). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Australia: Cambridge University Press.
Cahyani, I. (2012). Indonesian Language Learning. Central Jakarta: Directorate General of Islamic Education, Ministry of Religion of the Republic of Indonesia.
Dewi, S. & T. E. (2018). KESANTUNAN GURU DAN SISWA PEREMPUAN DALAM PEMBELAJARAN BAHASA INDONESIA DI SEKOLAH BILINGUAL. 15(2), 147. https://doi.org/10.30957/lingua.v15i2.
Febriadina, Z. F., Sumarwati, S., & Sumarlam, S. (2018). Male and Female Students’ Politeness in Sragen, Central Java. Humanus, 17(1), 73. https://doi.org/10.24036/humanus.v17i1.8429.
Kusno, A., & Rahman, A. (2016). Bentuk-Bentuk Pelanggaran Prinsip Kesopanan Dalam Ceramah Keagamaan. LiNGUA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa Dan Sastra, 11(2), 103. https://doi.org/10.18860/ling.v11i2.3502.
Leech, G. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. London and New York: Longman.
Mahmudi, A. (2009). Teachers In the Teaching and Learning Process. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algesindo.
Miles, B Matthew & Huberman, A. M. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis (Tjetjep Rohendi Rohidi Translation). Jakarta: UI-Press.
Muchtar, H. J. (2012). Educational Jurisprudence. Bandung: PT. YOUTH ROSDAKARYA.
Raco, J. R. (2010). Qualitative Research Methods. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia.
Rahardi, K. (2009). Sosiopragmatik. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga.
Romaine, S. (1984). The Language of Children And Adolescents: The Acquisition of Communicative Competence. Oxford: Basil Blackwell Publisher.
Sisbijanto, A. (1995). Politeness in language in the Sun. Purworejo: IKIP Muhamadiyah.
Sutopo, H. B. (2002). Qualitative Research Methods. Surakarta: UNS Press.
Watts, R. J. (2003). Politeness. Australia: Cambridge University Press.
Winataputra, U. (2009). Learning Theory and Learning. Jakarta: Open University.
Yule, G. (1996). The Study of Language. UK: Cambridge University Press.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v7i1.1378
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2020 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.